About HIPJ
HIPJ History
HIPJ Homepage
HIPJ FAQ
Weblog Archives

Search



Featured Posts
Iraq War WMD Case
Peak Oil Primer

Alternative News
Democracy Now
Z Magazine
Indypendent Magazine
Indymedia(US)
Indymedia(UK)
Counterpunch
Corporation Watch

US News
NY Times
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post
Washington Times
Boston Globe
LA Times
ABC News
CBS News
MSNBC
Fox News
CSPAN
CNN
Reuters

World News
BBC (UK) News
The Independent (UK)
The Guardian (UK)
The Hindu(India)
The Indian Express
The Dawn(Pakistan)
Globe and Mail (Canada)
Ha'aretz(Israel)
Jerusalem Post
Le Monde(France)
Mail and Guardian(South Africa)
Moscow Times (Russia)
Christian Science Monitor
United Press International
Colombia Times

Magazines/ Journals
The Economist
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
Business Week
News Week
Time Magazine
The Atlantic Monthly
Harpers
The New Republic
Outlook India
Frontline (India)

Harvard Publications
The Crimson
The Harvard Independent
The Harvard College Economist
Harvard Focus Europe
Diversity and Distinction
Flare
Harvard International Review
Harvard Perspective

Harvard Organizations
Harvard Friends of Amnesty International
Harvard Living Wage Campaign
Harvard Students Against Sweatshops

Archives By Category
Africa
Blog Notes
Cuba
HIPJ Meetings
Imperialism
India/Pakistan
Iran
Iraq
Israel/Palestine
Latin America
Mainstream Media
Militarism
Misc
Oil and Energy
Russia
Student Activism
United States
Video
Vietnam


Last 20 Posts
Former HIPJ Member and Democracy Now Producer Arrested at Republican National Convention
Georgia, Russia, Gas, Oil and Kosovo
Stephen Kinzer: America's Century of Regime Change
The Bush Administration's WMD Case for the Iraq War: Intelligence Sought to Justify a Decision Already Made
Naomi Klein Article: China's All-Seeing Eye
Seymour Hersh: U.S. Funding Covert Operations in Iran
New York Times Op-Ed: The Two Israels
Proposed US - Iraqi Alliance/ Status of Forces Agreement
KSG Article: "Playing Favorites on Dictators Robs U.S. of High Ground"
A Foreboding Day in History
Peak Oil Primer
Bush's Appeasement Speech in Israel & Recent History with Iran
Imperial Life in the Emerald City
Pangea Day
Lie by Lie: The Mother Jones Iraq War Timeline
McCain Implies Energy Guides U.S. Involvement in the Middle East
Kissinger's New Domino Theory
Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar
Harvard SDS Iraq War Die In
Letter from Jose Ramos-Horta

Recent Comments


www.iraqbodycount.org


Note: Iraq body count only uses media reported, corroborated casualty figures. The number above therefore represents a lower bound on the number of deaths. Other estimates are shown here





Kissinger's New Domino Theory

Former secretary of state, national security adviser and (!) nobel peace prize winner Henry Kissinger recently gave an interview to the Hoover Institute where he basically spelled out a new domino theory, although he does not use that exact term, justifying continued American involvement in Iraq.



The exchange starting at 20 seconds is:
Interviewer: America is exhausted by the war, every poll indicates that, but a political solution in Iraq remains elusive, at best. What is to be done?

Kissinger: I can only give the answer in terms of reality... this is not a war over Iraq, it is a war over radical Jihad and its assault on the secular order as we understand it. They won't stop. So if we withdraw from exhaustion the crisis will move to Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, maybe India. Any place there is a substantial Islamic population that become more radicalised.
Kissinger has endorsed McCain, and they seem to be in step in justifying continued involvement in Iraq based on the presence of groups like Al Qaeda, using the actions of these terrorist groups to bolster their agenda in the region.

Jon Stewart touched on the flipside of this equation in an interview with McCain on last night's "the daily show": Bin Laden using the Bush administration policies as a recruiting tool:



Starting around 4:30:
Jon Stewart: Don't you think that these past few years, in terms of a recruiting tool for Bin Laden and Al Qaeda...

Let's say Al Qaeda is trying to fire up their base, isn't President Bush kind of, and our policies there their "reverend Wright" that they throw out there to rally their troops? Isn't he the guy they throw out there and inflame their base and get support? Don't you actually think he's been ok for Al Qaeda?
Stewart is only pointing out the obvious, echoing experts like Michael Scheuer who have said that the Iraq war was the christmas gift Bin Laden never would have expected and that the war has validated everything bin Laden said.

There is a sinister symmetry here, each group using the threat of the other to rally their base and bolster their agendas. Will the world keep letting them?


Posted May 08, 2008 | Comments? (0)

Leave a comment